I thought the best way to keep you informed about my work at Morokoshi is to address the questions and comments many of you sent with regards to my last blog. Thank you very much for them as they are helping me with my work here. They also extend the collaborative spirit of my trip to a broader scale that extends beyond country, state and city lines. The following will address some of your comments.
1) Teacher Workshops: Working Together
As you are aware one of my main goals while volunteering at Morokoshi is to make every workshop or experience that I participate in one that includes the teachers thoughts. The latest workshop that I held was last Friday, July 16th, and we took our first collective steps understanding how emergent curriculum would work along the current structure. We began the workshop by dissecting the current lesson plans offered into the goals that we see for each. In particular I asked: What are the developmental goals for each lesson plan based along social emotional, fine motor and large motor, language (verbal and nonverbal), mathematical, and logical development. Due to time we were only able to break down two types of lessons those that fall within Language and the other was Science/Nature. During this time I took a step back and had the teachers share their ideas because these lesson plans came from them and not from me. I also told them how these goals will become the foundation for how we work with the children within an emergent curriculum experience. They were initially reluctant but soon they were offering up their ideas and we generated two lists for each type of lesson.
I then had the group participate in an activity that would connect them to an activity that I have done with children at Cow Hollow School: “Shape Hunters”. During this part of the workshop the teachers went outside with a piece of a paper and looked throughout the yard for objects that were in the shapes of circles, ovals, squares and triangles. When they returned they shared their ideas. From this list I showed them how we can incorporate the same goals we have for our other lessons within this project. The key difference being that we are taking what the children offer us as opposed to making these choices ourselves. In particular we discussed how we can begin to categorize the different objects found, how we can practice our early literacy by writing the words of these objects down, down we nourish the children’s creativity and imagination because they are open to draw any way they want and lastly how we can develop a constructive and healthy approach to disagreement. This last one was demonstrated when one of the teachers shared with the group that she saw an oval in the cow’s eye (this was a real cow and not an illustration). After hearing this I asked the following: What would you do if another child stood up and said, “No a cow’s eye isn’t oval it is a circle.” No one responded so I suggested that if we asked the child what he/she meant by a circle we might discover that this child was referring to cow’s pupil while the other child was referring to the outer rim of the eye. The point being that instead of passing judgments along what is right or wrong we support children along their learning experiences.
After this activity we discussed some ideas that could be used in the classroom that use the same goals from the current lesson plans and apply them to the children’s real life experiences. In particular, how can we develop the children’s logical and critical thinking skills through their play and use of classroom materials. Now this was a tough one and I realized that the expectations that I had for the teachers was too high. This is in no way to suggest that the teachers are not intelligent enough to talk about this but I realized that how can I expect the teachers to discuss emergent curriculum when the key ingredient: children, are absent from the discussion. With that said, I shared with the teachers some ideas I had and how they would foster the same goals we discussed earlier in the workshop and set up a plan to work together in the classroom trying them out with the children. After we do this for three weeks we will meet again and reflect on these experiences. From these reflections the teachers themselves will create new opportunities in the future that will include the children’s ideas.
The last part was to discuss how this type of work could be given as a homework assignment. Currently it is important for the teachers and the children’s caregivers for the children to be given daily homework assignments. This can include the rewriting of words or adding up objects the teacher has drawn in their workbooks. Since this is important to the school’s culture I did not want to remove it from the school’s routine but to see how we can adapt it to include more of the children’s ideas. From the “Shape Hunters” project one teacher said that for a homework assignment the children could bring an object from home that is in the shape of a circle. This was a great idea because we instantly brainstormed ideas of how new lesson plans could be generated from what the children brought in. It also brought up some concerns the teachers had such as the safety of objects at school and what parents may think of with regards to the assignment. What was great about this was the teachers were beginning to make what I suggested into their own because they understood their school’s community far greater then I ever would. This is exactly my goal!
2) Role of Documentation: Expanding our Relationships with Our Students
Some have asked how documentation will be used in the classrooms. In particular, how it will work when the teacher to child ratio is too large. I think when I wrote documentation many of us might be familiar to the types of documentation that is done within the classroom’s we teach in or the classrooms our children have come from. This type of documentation would include but is not limited to: children’s work (art, writing), photographs of children in play/learning, children’s ideas being represented through classroom set up and materials, and many others. In this particular case I am asking the teachers to carry with them a small spiral notebook that is to be used to write down quick notes on what the children are doing, saying as well as what the teachers themselves are feeling or the questions they may have. The example I gave is when I was working with a group of children in the Middle Class I wrote down each child’s name and briefly jotted down what they sculpted which included: the alphabet, shapes, their names, people. I also shared with them how I worked with one child in particular in sculpting his name. This is a quick process and only feels overwhelming when it is something new. This is then only documentation that I wanted the teachers to use so they would not become overwhelmed by the heavy workload they are already carrying.
From this documentation the teachers will be able to recall their experiences with more tangible examples when we: 1) use them as points of reflection in a later workshop, 2) to help them with the assessment of the children, and 3) being used as a tool when discussing children with their caregivers. Furthermore, this will strengthen the bonds the teachers have created with the children because they will better understand the children they teach. It will put them more in touch with the children’s emotional needs that will translate into developing positive relationships the children have with each other and with the teachers. The students clearly see the teachers as people who care for them, as they will often get excited when they see a teacher arriving to school shouting out their names and greeting them at the gate. The teachers have also increased the amounts of time they are playing with the children that will further strengthen this bond. When the teachers begin to include emergent curriculum ideas this bond will include trust, respect and honor.
3) Role of Parents in School’s Development
In the last blog I failed to mention the Parent’s Meeting that I participated in during my first week at Morokoshi School. After the meeting a group of parents met with Steve, the school’s owner, and expressed concerns about the children’s work being done in the Baby Class (3-4 year olds) and in particular how they have seen a digression in the children’s work. This was very troubling for Steve to hear and he instantly called an all staff meeting to discuss what is currently happening or not happening in the Baby Class. The meeting was very productive as we discussed how to balance what the parent’s needs with what we feel is developmentally appropriate for certain age groups. In particular the group collectively saw that one element that was missing in the school’s program was how we inform the children’s caregivers of the type of work being done in the school and how such work develops the children along different developmental domains.
One particular hot button topic was the children being able to recognize and then write the alphabet. One teaching intern was troubled by this and shared that at this age what is important for children is to be able to develop the fine motor skills necessary to write letters and that it is okay for children to scribble. Steve could see this but again expressed that the school’s primary goals were to always take into account the caregiver’s concerns. We concluded the meeting that whatever is done at the school needs to be effectively communicated to the caregivers so they understand what we are doing as well as feel involved in the children’s experiences. Since we were making a commitment in doing this we knew this would translate more into the caregivers taking more accountability in their child’s work which would include their participation in their child’s homework as well as commitment to having the children show up on time with the necessary materials.
4) Follow Up After Departure
Some have asked what the follow up plan is when I depart. What is interesting about this point was while I was writing this blog, Steve came in and we had an impromptu meeting about what has been happening so far. He was very happy about what is going on but was also concerned about what is being done might get lost once I leave. He brought along Beatrice, who is going to be teaching at Morokoshi next year, and thought she would be a great person that I would communicate with when I leave. We discussed the possibility of every month emailing each other about what is happening at the school as well as to discuss any questions that have come up with regards to the new practices that have been created at the school. Steve asked that I work with Beatrice in creating an assessment tool that she can use that looks at specific things at the school: classroom environment, lesson plans, assessment, etc. Furthermore, we discussed the need to sit down with Ruth, the head teacher, Steve and myself to write up the final report based on the work that I had done. IN particular we would discuss the roles that each teacher has while working at Morokoshi, the goals the school has to develop and foster a high level of education (which includes better teacher:child ratios, building of new classroom, lunch programs, etc), as well as expanding the school’s community to include parent’s voices.
Thanks for all your questions and I know there are plenty more that I did not address. I hope they will be answered in later blogs or when I return from my trip. I need to go home and rest because tomorrow I visit one of the Teacher Colleges here in Nakuru. I am very excited and have no idea what I am in store for. I really hope they do not have me say anything in front of the class.